FAQs
We have created this Frequently Asked Question ("FAQ") page in the hope that it will help to answer most of the questions that people may have.
While we can not provide legal advice via e-mail, we will attempt to respond promptly to any general questions about drunk driving or criminal law or about the office and our area of practice sent via E-mail. If you need legal assistance please call us at:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
216.831.3939
If we are unable to assist you, we will attempt to refer you to someone who can.
.WHAT DO POLICE OFFICERS LOOK FOR WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER TO PULL SOMEONE OVER FOR DRUNK DRIVING?
Most DUI arrests occur at night and on week-ends. The following is a list of symptoms in descending order of probability that the person observed is driving while intoxicated while driving at night. The list is based upon research conducted by the National Highway Traffic Administration (NHTSA):
1. Turning wih a wide radius
2. Straddling center of lane marker
3. “Appearing to be drunk”
4. Almost strinking object or vehicle
5. Weaving
6. Driving on other than designated highway
7. Swerving
8. Speed more than 10 MPH below limit
9. Stoping without cause in traffic lane
10.
Following too closely
11.
Drifting
12. Tires on center or lane marker
13. Braking erratically
14. Driving into opposing or crossing traffic
15. Signaling inconsistent with driving action
16. Slow response to traffic signals
17. Stopping inappropriately / (not in lane)
18. Turning abruptly or illegally
19. Accelerating or decelerating rapidly
20. Driving with headlights off
While sp
While speeding has not been identified by NHTSA as an indicator of impairment, it is a common prosecution tactic to argue that speeding is "risk taking" behavior suggestive of diminished judgment occasioned by alcohol consumption.
WHAT IS THE OFFICER LOOKING FOR DURING THE INITIAL STOP?
Police officers are trained to note the following "symptoms of intoxication" on their report:
¨
Flushed face
¨ Red, watery, glassy and/or bloodshot eyes
¨
Odor of alcohol on breath
¨ Slurred speech
¨
Fumbling with wallet trying to get license
¨ Failure to comprehend
the officer's questions
¨ Staggering when exiting vehicle
¨
Swaying/instability on feet
¨ Leaning on car for support
¨
Combative, argumentative, jovial or other "inappropriate" attitude
¨
Soiled, rumpled, disorderly clothing
¨ Stumbling while walking
¨
Disorientation as to time and place
¨ Inability to follow directions or to "divide attention."
WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I AM STOPPED FOR DRUNK DRIVING?
Have your driver’s license, registration and proof of insurance card ready to present them to the police.
Politely ask for a lawyer
Politely submit to a “pat down” search,
handcuffing and arrest
Be considerate. Do not argue with the police
Politely refuse to submit to ANY “field sobriety testing” (Discussed in more detail below)
Do not try to talk your way out of it. All you will do is give the officer more ammunition to use against you at trial! REMAIN SILENT!
Do
not try to flee. You will be caught and you will be charged with additional, and probably more serious, crimes
WHAT SHOULD I SAY IF THE OFFICER ASKS ME IF I HAVE HAD ANYTHING TO DRINK?
You are not required to answer potentially incriminating questions. A polite "I would like to speak with an attorney before I answer any questions" is a good reply. DO NOT ANSWER POLICE QUESTIONS! YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT!
WHAT ARE “FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS?”
In theory, Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) are designed to simulate and evaluate your “divided attention” abilities; a critical skill when driving a motor vehicle. In reality, SFSTs are not really tests at all but are ridiculous gymnastic events that will usually result in your failure and the “results” will be presented to a jury or judge at the time of trial. The “tests” are highly subjective, are almost never conducted properly by police and are conducted under abnormal conditions. The SFSTs are NOT scientific and there are many people who, for many innocent reasons, cannot perform these tests to the officer’s satisfaction under any conditions.
Additionally, because these tests are judged by negative scoring techniques (i.e. you get points deducted if the officer thinks you
did something wrong but you do not get points added if you did something right), it is possible that you could do everything right
and still fail simply because the officer thought you performed the tests slowly or that you started the tests before he/she was completely
finished explaining what to do.
The usual battery of SFSTs include:
The “Walk and Turn” where the subject is required to take nine heel-to-toe steps along an imaginary “line,” turns, and then takes
nine heel-to-toe steps back to the place of start. This is usually conducted on the side of the road (which is usually sloped) with
police flashers going (which cause a strobe affect) and with traffic running in both directions causing wind currents and headline
glare. (It should not be surprising that someone is unable to complete this test satisfactorily.)
The “One Leg Stand” where the subject is instructed to stand with his/her heels together, arms at their side, and then told to raise
one leg six inches off the ground while counting out loud until the officer says to stop. Again, this test is conducted under the
same absurd conditions as the “Walk and Turn” making it unlikely that anyone can pass. If you raise your arms for balance, sway, hop
or put your foot down … you failed. (How often to you ever have to keep your balance without being able to use your arms?)
The “Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus” test where the officer will position an object, usually a pen or his/her finger, 12-15 inches away
from the subject’s face and moves the object from side to side while watching the subject’s eyes for the ability to track and/or the
involuntary jerking of the eyeball which is supposed to be an indication that the subject has consumed some amount of alcohol. Among
the several problems with this test are that a large percentage of society experiences nystagmus naturally or may have it as
a result of various medical and physical disorders or prescribed or over the counter drugs; the test requires that the officer use
precise distances and angles in order to assure it is conducted properly and no officer ever uses any type of measuring devices (i.e.
rulers or compasses) to accurately measure what they are testing.
(There are several other tests
but they are used very infrequently these days. These tests include the “Finger to Nose,” reciting the alphabet backwards (can anyone
even do that sober?), counting tests (being asked to count by various denominations like “count by 7s – again, no one can do it sober)
and some others.)
¨
One additional test that does show up more frequently is the “Preliminary
Alcohol Screening” test also known as the PAS or PBT test. This is the portable breath test and is supposed to determine the presence
of alcohol. It is an extremely dangerous test because it is not accurate but the courts will allow it to establish the content of
your breath alcohol and thus, your guilt of the charges. THIS TEST IS NOT THE BREATH TEST THAT IS REQUIRED BY THE IMPLIED CONSENT
LAW and although the police are supposed to tell the subject that, they rarely do. You may (AND SHOULD) refuse to take the roadside
breath test.
WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I AM ASKED TO TAKE A FIELD SOBRIETY TEST?
According
to the DUI / OMVI / DWI laws of the State of
Suffice it to say that your response to the officer is that you will not agree to submit to the tests. If the officer
asks “why not?” your response is that you want an attorney present before you take any tests so that you can discuss your “concerns”
about the tests. (This leaves the reasons for not taking the test wide open at the time of trial: i.e. was one of your “concerns”
an old football injury to your knees? Were you tired from a hard day’s work? Did you have the flu? Do you suffer from migraine headaches
that may be activated by strobe light conditions such as the police flashers? The “concerns” are endless and you have a right to talk
to counsel before taking the roadside tests! It is better to develop the reasons at trial than try to think of one at the arrest site!
If the officer asks you what your "concerns" are, you should NOT tell him/her. Just say that you would prefer to discuss them with
an attorney.
If for some reason you have already taken one
or more of the SFSTs, you need an experienced drunk driving attorney like Dennis P. Levin at 216.831.3939, who knows how to counteract
the damaging evidence that the police officer will produce as a result of those tests. Proper cross-examination of the office can
usually help a jury to understand the faults and problems with the tests and the manner in which they are given and that just because
a police officer says so, it does not mean that a person was driving drunk.
SHOULD I TAKE THE BREATH TEST AT
THE POLICE STATION?
PLEASE NOTE … THE BREATH TEST AT THE POLICE STATTION IS NOT THE SAME AS THE ROADSIDE BREATH TEST. YOU CAN REFUSE THE ROADSIDE BREATH TEST WITHOUT RECEIVING ANY KIND OF PENALTY FOR THE REFUSAL.
If the officer decides to charge you with a drunken driving offense,
you will be placed under arrest and taken to the police station where you will be asked to take a breathalyzer test to determine the
quantity of alcohol in your system. (In rare occasions, a blood or urine test may be requested instead of the breathalyzer.)
If you agree to submit to a BAC / blood alcohol content test and you test over
The fact of refusal can be introduced into evidence as "consciousness
of guilt." Of course, the defense is free to offer other reasons for the refusal. Thus, the decision is one of weighing the likelihood
of a high blood-alcohol reading against the administrative consequences for refusing. By refusing a BAC test, particularly when you
are likely to have a high reading, you deprive the state of potentially compelling evidence against you.
You should also be aware that some police officers will take a request to speak to an attorney at the time the implied consent breath test is offered to be a refusal. You can ask the officer if you can call your attorney but don't argue with him/her if they say "no."